ChatGPT is like a research assistant who, as long as you give them reasonably clear instructions, will provide you with a clear response quickly.
Here is a small test looking at the questions raised on chemicals, etc, for the Commissioner-designate hearings.
I checked the answers. They were nearly correct. Chat GPT was quicker than I was issue-spotting, but it missed some things.
A helpful reminder is to use it as a tool. Just as with the work of a smart research assistant, you would not let their work out the door without checking and reviewing.
Interestingly, some questions from earlier versions have fallen aside.
The only way for a Group to check what Commissioner-designates will do/not do they want, if any, when they take up office is by follow-up questions. It is not clear if there is time for those.
It issued