The case for taking a leaf out of Formula 1 when presenting Amendments

I think it is common courtesy for MEPs/Member States to acknowledge the source of the inspiration behind amendments to Commission proposals.

 

It is a practice that MEPs I worked for were happy to practice. During a presentation to the ENVI Committee, it was simply good form to thank interests from industry, technical experts and  NGOs for their contributions that had led to amendments being tabled.

 

Doing so has three main advantages:

  1. Clarifies legislative intent
  2. Greater openness and transparency
  3. Acknowledges hard work

I am sure with the technology that exists. We could see a Formula 1 suit/car-like sponsorship viewing experience. The sources of the amendments appear on the front of the jackets of members/ministers/working party members when they are speaking on behalf of the amendment.

 

 

 

I guess it could be done quickly. A simple change to the rules of procedure of the Council & EP. Or at the least, a line in the justification to an amendment on where it came from.

It will help the Commission understand the source of the idea and prepare suitable responses. Maybe it is an old issue that has been long discussed. Understanding who inspired the re-appearance of the idea will assist everyone’s understanding.

And, I can’t envisage a case when anyone would be too shy and not wanting to acknowledge publically their contribution to law-making.