Two Mental Maps for Dealing with EU Law Making

Most people think a story has three parts: a beginning, a middle, and an end.

Master storytellers, like Joseph Campbell,  think there are 12 stages.

 

 

Source link

The Journey of an EU  Law

It is the same with European lawmaking.

A lot of people think of law making in three parts in three parts:  the Commission prepares proposals; the Council and the European Parliament dispose of the proposal; and the Member States implement the proposal.

The Commission identifies 6 stages to the lifecycle of a legislative proposal:

Source: European Commission Working Methods, p.10

 

Most lobbyists consider that their file is unique, somehow special. They like to start afresh from the start on every procedure. I have heard people ordaining that the proposal they are dealing with is  ‘unique’, ‘unprecedented’ and ‘one of a kind’.  And, whilst it may be special in terms of the interests or politics at play, the adoption of the legislative or regulatory file follows a well-worn path.

Two Mental Models

I have a small circle of competence and only work on a handful of legislative and regulatory procedures: from ordinary legislative proposals, special legislative procedures (OELs), secondary legislation (Delegated acts, RPS measures, Implementing  acts) and the associated work of a few  supporting agencies  procedures set down in laws, mainly in CLP and REACH.

For each one of these procedures, I use my own personal well-established process chart, checklists of good  (and not to follow bad) practices, and case studies.   I see these checklists, process charts, and case studies as a map to guide you through the legislative and regulatory journey.  Each journey is slightly different, with new people, interests and politics at play, but in 99% of the time, the journey is the same.

 

Ordinary Legislation 

For ordinary legislation, I chunk the journey down in to the following stages:

 

 

From policy formulation to policy adoption, there are around 67 steps s. Many of these steps give you a window of opportunity to influence the law you want.

What I have noticed over 25 years, is that the most crucial stage is the ideation phase. If you can win the battle for ideas you can bring your idea onto the political agenda, and indeed off the political agenda.

Once an idea moves over the agenda setting and then over policy formulation, the chances of removing an idea’s associated public policy action reduce considerably.

On many of the legislative files I have worked taking through, there is usually a rich history of 10 or more years. The idea’s arrival on the EU’s agenda and the legislative table was never surprising.

 

Technical law-making 

For my work dealing with agencies and the subsequent adoption of measures (Delegated acts, Implementing acts, RPS Measures)

Each procedure has a particular set of steps, whether it is a classification proposal, a REACH Restriction, a REACH Substance Evaluation, etc, but the general stages are the same.
Let me explain.
The most important step is the ‘ideation’, the process of forming the ideas for actions. The journey is familiar.  For substance files, it is often the appearance in scientific research and academic publications.  There is a moment in time when this research spills over from the research labs and academic publications into the mainstream and opinion-forming media. Then it gets picked up by decision-makers in government agencies and politicians.
Once a substance gets picked up by a government or the Commission, it is more or less cast into a  new stage.  After a substance is put forward, it is for the Agency to deliberate on the issue, with the assistance of their expert Committees. After they have come up with their recommendation, they pass the file over to the Commission. They prepare and adopt the proposal with Member State expert committees’ advice. And after they have come to a decision, the draft law is sent to the Council and European Parliament to scrutinise and in some cases (delegated acts/RPS measures) give them the power to block the law.
This is a simplistic broad brush approach. The operational map is more detailed for each of these stages. But, it helps explain most substance journeys.
Overton Window
The only difficult part  is how an idea gets taken up. It does not happen by accident. A good way to understand why ideas get taken up is the mental model of the  Overton Window.
As the Mackinac Center put it, “If your idea lies outside the window, trying to convince politicians to embrace it is a steep hill to climb” but there are a number of actions and steps you can take to make it happen” (see link).
Source link
There are some deliberate steps you can take to get your idea taken up. To see how that can happen, the Mackinac Center has excellent material.
What approaches do you use to guide your clients and members through ordinary and secondary legislation?